Commonwealth
of Virginia
Office of the Governor
Mark
R. Warner
Governor
June 23, 2004
The Honorable Alphonso Jackson
Secretary
U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
451 th Street, S. W.
Washington, D.C. 20410
Dear Secretary Jackson:
I am writing to express my most serious concerns over recent changes in
the Housing Choice Voucher program and the impact those changes augur
for people with disabilities. I have met with advocates from across the
Commonwealth who described to me personal challenges that seem
disproportionate for people with disabilities needing housing supports.
I am urging you to consider what I am sure are unintended consequences
brought about by budgetary pressures.
Housing is a critical need, made even more so for people with
disabilities who depend on income supports from the Social Security
Administration, where Supplemental Security Income (SSI) payments are
as low as $565 per month. Recent studies have indicated that there is
not a single Metropolitan Statistical Area within the United States in
which an individual receiving SSI can afford to rent a one-bedroom
apartment using HUD's Fair Market Rent guidelines. With the 1999
Olmstead Supreme Court mandate that people with disabilities receiving
services in institutions be served in appropriate community settings,
the need for housing supports at all levels is even more critical
today. There is an obligation to expand housing supports rather than
restrict them.
The recent changes in the Housing Choice Voucher program are
particularly troublesome for people with disabilities for several
reasons. A reduction in administrative fees has resulted in a
diminished capacity of program administrators to provide the outreach
and assistance services necessary to support people with disabilities
who are searching for accessible, affordable housing. Landlord
recruitment into the program has historically been a challenge and can
be expected only to worsen as a result of the administrators' reduced
service capacity.
HUD has indicated that increased flexibility in the voucher program
will allow administrators to shift income mix, which would improve the
budgetary shortfall only if the number of extremely low income
participants or the amount of the rent subsidies were reduced. These
are precisely the strategies that target people with disabilities -
most certainly, an unintended consequence. I urge you to consider the
potentially devastating impact this would have on SSI recipients and
other extremely low-income people with disabilities.
Other budgetary curtailment strategies available to administrators,
such as time limitations, reducing the payment standard amounts for
currently leased units, raising minimum rents, eliminating exception
rents, reducing vouchers in circulation by not reissuing unused ones,
for example, would prove equally devastating to people with
disabilities who have extremely low incomes. Given the current public
policies that define income supports for this group of citizens, it is
clear that rent support policy changes such as the ones currently being
implemented target the most vulnerable segment of people with
disabilities and pose a significant threat to attempts to implement the
spirit and intent of the Supreme Court's decision in Olmstead.
For these reasons I am asking you to delay any further implementation
actions until a complete review of the impact of this policy on people
with disabilities can be completed. While I am fully aware of the
budgetary challenges represented by these policy changes, I am more
concerned about the lives of the citizens that will be displaced and
disrupted if we fail to give full consideration to the disproportionate
impact of this policy on people with disabilities.
Sincerely,
<signed>
Mark R. Warner
MRW/cmg
Cc: The Honorable Jane H. Woods
Secretary of Health and Human
Resources
Ms. Jan Faircloth
Virginia Liaison Office